top of page
b37

PROGENERATION(TM)

AG-COMPARISON

1-removebg_edited.png

AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS COMPARISON
 

Over the last 200 years, agriculture has undergone a profound transformation. What began as localized, labor-intensive, and ecologically attuned practices gradually shifted into large-scale, input-driven models with the onset of the Industrial Revolution. The Green Revolution of the mid-20th century marked a pivotal point—introducing chemical fertilizers, synthetic pesticides, high-yielding seed varieties, and mechanization to dramatically boost food production. While this revolution helped prevent widespread famine, it also introduced long-term ecological consequences: soil depletion, pollution, loss of biodiversity, and dependence on external inputs.

​

In response to these challenges, a new wave of practices—Regenerative Agriculture—emerged to heal degraded lands and restore natural cycles. Yet, even within this movement, some systems still rely on synthetic or biotech interventions, leaving questions about long-term sustainability and resilience.

​

Enter ProGenerative Regeneration—a paradigm that not only seeks to heal the land but to restore life itself by aligning with nature’s purest principles. It expands the focus beyond yield and soil to include people, ecosystems, local economies, and long-term stewardship. This comparison explores the defining features, inputs, and impact of these three major agricultural models—Traditional (Green Revolution) Farming, Regenerative Farming, and ProGenerative Regeneration—offering a clear view of how each approach shapes the future of food, ecology, and human development.

1-removebg_edited.png

AGRICULTURE
SYSTEMS

TRADITONAL

TRADITIONAL (GREEN REVOLUTION) FARMING

​Traditional farming methods, particularly those driven by the Green Revolution, focus on maximizing yields and efficiency through the use of high-yielding seed varieties, chemical fertilizers, synthetic pesticides, mechanization, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). While these practices have increased global food production, they have also led to soil degradation, water pollution, reduced biodiversity, and growing dependency on external inputs, while at the same time has shrunk profitability margins and has caused a loss of autonomy for the farmers.  This model is largely extractive, prioritizing short-term gains over long-term ecological or community health.

1-removebg_edited.png

REGENERATIVE

FARMING

REGENERATIVE FARMING

Regenerative farming is a land-based practice focused on improving soil health, increasing biodiversity, and restoring ecosystems through methods like cover cropping, reduced tillage, crop rotation, and managed grazing. While many regenerative practitioners aim for organic or low-input systems, regenerative farming as a movement does not universally exclude the use of synthetic inputs or genetically modified organisms (GMOs).  In some contexts, the use of fertilizers, herbicides, biotech solutions, or other synthetic inputs are still considered acceptable if it is considered to contribute to overall land restoration and productivity yield goals.

 

1-removebg_edited.png

REGENERATION

PROGENERATIVE

ProGenerative Regeneration

ProGenerative Regeneration is not just a method—it is a transformational agricultural framework grounded in principles, aligned with nature, and designed for long-term vitality. While it builds on the core foundations of regenerative farming, it deliberately moves beyond by rejecting the use of synthetic inputs, GMOs, and artificial interventions—recognizing that these approaches disrupt the intelligence, balance, and healing capacities of natural systems.

​

In its agricultural application, ProGenerative Regeneration restores land through living systems: the soil food web, mineral coherence, closed-loop nutrient cycling, and biologically intelligent relationships between plants, microbes, and environments. It is a systems-based approach that sees the farm not as an isolated entity, but as part of a larger living ecosystem—interconnected with community, health, economy, and purpose.

1-removebg_edited.png

SUMMARY

SUMMARY COMPARISON

  • Traditional Farming maximizes yield through external inputs, including chemicals and GMOs—extractive and high-impact.

  • Regenerative Farming heals the land, may still use synthetics or GMOs, depending on context.

  • ProGenerative Regeneration is holistic, life-based, and non-synthetic, working only with the intelligence of natural systems to create resilient ecosystems and thriving human communities.

​​

©2024 by Campos Holding Company

1-removebg.png
bottom of page